Tech Brief 24 November 2025 arrives as the British tech world faces awkward questions, fresh scandal, and the usual scramble to keep up with global rivals. The stories today centre on AI policy, misplaced faith in technology, and the stubborn bias baked into our digital platforms. Missed yesterday’s Tech Brief? Catch up here before diving in.
AI Pioneer Urges UK to Take Risks as Tech Race Heats Up
“Britain needs to move faster, or we’ll lose our edge,” warns a respected computer scientist, voicing a concern not heard this publicly since the days after Acorn faded from classrooms. The urgency is real, if a bit too familiar from the BCS’s newsletters from the 1980s. He calls for bolder artificial intelligence investment, fearing the UK will fall permanently behind the United States and China.
Policymakers are responding with cautious optimism, but venture capital still flows slower here than through Silicon Valley’s start-ups. This story matters to anyone who remembers seeing British-made computers on classroom desks, not just in museums. You can practically hear the hiss and whirr of an old cassette drive every time someone mentions a “UK tech renaissance”.
It’s a call that echoes the warnings of pioneers like Sophie Wilson, whose work on the BBC Micro once put Britain at the forefront of computing innovation. Could true invention return if regulations and risk aversion keep jamming the signal? Maybe the homemade style of British tech just needs more breathing room.
Post Office Scandal Upends Faith in Tech “Objectivity”
Here is a nightmare that feels both new and eerily routine. Innocent subpostmasters were told their only hope, blaming a faulty computer, would never convince a jury. The latest evidence in the Post Office scandal highlights how technical misunderstanding and overconfidence destroyed lives.
Academic scrutiny now questions the British legal system’s reliance on supposedly infallible code. The Horizon IT system was treated as gospel, and people paid the price for bugs hiding in the software’s depths. This is a sharp rebuke to the “computer says no” culture that many have poked fun at; yet, as this case shows, can turn deadly serious.
What will prevent this happening again? It is not just about software audits, but about teaching institutions to treat every system log with suspicion. Trust is earned, not installed with the latest patch.
AI Workers Warn Friends: “Stay Away from the Industry”
Bold question: if the people building artificial intelligence say it’s not safe, who is left to trust? Recent stories reveal AI moderators and dataset labourers now urge loved ones to steer clear of tech’s most hyped sector.
One worker recalls being required to flag toxic content all day without meaningful support. It is the classic call-centre tactic; only now, each click feeds a trillion-pound economy. The warnings echo an old punk-digital ethic: DIY if you must, but never sell your conscience short.
As more value-driven staff leave the field, the talent gap widens and the risk of unchecked bias only grows. Will this be the moment the industry listens, or just another footnote in digital folklore? Nobody moderates the moderating, and that gap is getting wider with every sprint to profit.
LinkedIn Algorithmic Bias Exposed as Women Pose as “Bros” for Engagement
Cold fact: women using traditionally male names and “bro-speak” on LinkedIn see sharp upward spikes in both engagement and job offers. The platform denies that its algorithms care about gender, but the data points in another direction.
This is workplace sexism, rewritten in code and hidden beneath layers of recommendation logic. The dirty truth is that a suit and tie still gets you further; only now the suit is a username and the tie is an engagement score.
Some find old-school prejudice jarring in a supposedly modern forum, but the bias is not surprising for anyone who saw how early internet spaces mirrored office politics. Algorithmic neutrality remains more of an ideal than a reality. If anything, the latest “bro boost” makes bias even harder to challenge than in the dial-up days.
From the Wayback Machine
On This Day: 1859 – Darwin Publishes “On the Origin of Species”
Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution upended 19th-century biological science. The first edition, pressed by John Murray in London, sold out instantly. There was no genetics yet, since Mendel’s peas were still under wraps, but Darwin’s case for natural selection rested on observation, comparative anatomy, and years of quiet experimentation. The “tree of life” model he described is now coded into both biology and, oddly, the patchwork family trees of vintage computing.
Today’s Big Question
Tech Brief 24 November 2025 leaves us asking who gets to say no to technology. If unchecked belief in systems has led to injustice, and industry insiders are warning us away, who shoulders the risk? Maybe today’s best innovation is caution, not code.
Keep your jumpers close and your soldering irons ready. There are always new bugs to hunt in tomorrow’s updates.
Missed yesterday’s Tech Brief? Catch up here
Leave a Reply